🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the NYC race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – not just who would win overall, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections born and raised in the city, has spent more than ten years in progressive politics and has become something of a local celebrity this year for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He published his highly detailed prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate was victorious although missing the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. Lange possesses a talent for clever terms. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from one neighborhood to another area to Astoria, where he predicted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, certain media outlets and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters favored Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

What was your election night?

I had to do that since they were adding approximately 200K votes into the tally every few minutes! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: The candidate led the early vote by 12 points, but there were large groups of votes added later and the advantage went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, it was possible in which yesterday went kind of poorly for him, where Cuomo would have essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. However Mamdani gained half a million supporters to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did the mayor-elect get those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: diverse racially, it’s young, tenants and individuals facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the earlier election. Additionally he boosted his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, young, renters and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Voters in immigrant strongholds that supported Trump last year backed Zohran this year. However it’s not that he was winning over white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the record participation. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I figured we might go over 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a huge number of participants. Existed a substantial opposition group, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to surpass half. He’s at 50.4% but there’s still around 200K ballots left to report at that time. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think probable, and I wish he achieves it so afterwards none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote plummeted.

He lost any district in any area. Including Tottenville in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump area. That really surprised me. Cuomo kept very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these Republicans on the island who had a strong turnout. I believe occurred a lot of strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it before the former president tweeted his support for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

I think there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the property owners and residents all went for Cuomo. So there existed some opposition. However no, largely the leftist base is a key factor why Mamdani won – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote we reported on whether Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

There are areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel was influential there. Similarly in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they favored the independent. Plus, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, they were pretty staunchly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if existed major surprises here, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that key figures from progressives hail from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – people will come from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I believe that each urban center in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in America – because youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities we face.